The city of Paterson, New Jersey put the health of several employees in danger when they allowed them to remove asbestos-containing tiles from municipal property on Ellison Street late last year, says the state department of labor. Now, after an investigation of the incident and a probe of other municipal facilities, the agency has determined that Paterson committed a total of 43 OSHA violations, 13 of them related to asbestos removal. The city now faces potential fines of $4500 per violation per day, an article in the The Record reports. It is unclear as to whether any of those fines have been imposed at this time. Paterson’s health department halted renovations on the 2nd floor of 133 Ellison Street last December when it was determined that there were issues concerning asbestos exposure . The area where the work was occurring has remained sealed off since that time. A private, licensed abatement company will be hired to complete the asbestos removal . The situation involved both municipal employees as well as inmates involved in the local Passaic County Sheriff’s Labor Assistance Program. The sheriff’s department is also conducting an investigation into the incident. In the meantime, those who may have been exposed to the asbestos tiles are concerned about whether or not they might develop an asbestos-related disease in the future. The material is a known carcinogen, responsible for diseases such as mesothelioma , which attacks the lining around the lungs. Paterson Mayor Jeffrey Jones believes the city must now implement a training program that will teach employees to identify lead and asbestos when working in old city-owned properties, where the materials are commonplace. “We don’t have the luxury to not know,” Jones said. “We don’t want to put anyone in harm’s way.”
Read More...Cancer News
- Bladder Cancer (65)
- Brain Tumor Cancer (38)
- Breast Cancer (8038)
- Cancer Bulletins (543)
- Cancer Clinical Trials (5106)
- Cancer Treatment (1201)
- Colon Rectal Cancer (5951)
- General Cancer (16806)
- Leukemia Lymphoma Cancer (10572)
- Lung Mesothelioma Asbestos (4824)
- Ovarian Cervical Uterine Cancer (1137)
- Pancreatic Cancer (56)
- Prostate Cancer (6895)
- Skin Cancer (6030)
- Uncategorized (53)
-
Cancer News Topics
- New algorithm maps cancer cells like nodes on a social network
- UK Aims To Make Genetic Testing Available To All Cancer Patients
- Cancer Survivors Suffer Physical & Emotional Impairments Which Often Go Untreated
- Outcome In Head And Neck Cancer Predicted By Genetic Diversity Within Tumors
- Software May Allow Doctors To Track Progression Of Cancer, Response To Treatment, And Risk Of Relapse
- Cancer Cause Directs Treatment 0314.2013-13.23
- Compound in Mediterranean diet makes cancer cells ‘mortal’
- Timing of cancer radiation therapy may minimize hair loss
- Hairdressers to boost cancer treatment fund
- Commonly used catheters double risk of blood clots in ICU and cancer patients
- Molecular marker from pancreatic ‘juices’ helps identify pancreatic cancer
- Nonmelanoma Skin Cancers Can Be Dangerous, Disfiguring and Deadly
- Samantha gets the chop for cancer charity
- Big Data Unveils Exciting Head and Neck Cancer Targets
- Lung Cancer Living Room 4-16-13
- Isabelle Daza talks about Cervical Cancer
- PROSTATE CANCER VIDEO "Surgery"
- Doctors narrow guidelines for prostate cancer screening
- Bringing a New Stem Cell Treatment to Cancer Patients: Dr. Karen Aboody, M.D. at TEDxAJU
- Bionimbus protected data cloud to enable researchers to analyze cancer data
- Genetic diversity within tumors predicts outcome in head and neck cancer
- Mechanism linking key inflammatory marker to cancer identified
- Pioneers of revolutionary cancer treatment mark 1,000th patient milestone at Basingstoke hospital
- Lecture to focus on cancer research success
- County Museum Profiles History of Regional Asbestos Use

Asbestos Fines Levied at Old Pfizer Site
The Morris Plains Patch reports that “fines levied by the New Jersey Department of Labor for violations during asbestos abatement” caused a work stoppage at the old Pfizer Pharmaceuticals facility on Route 53 in Northern New Jersey late last month. According to the article, contractors who were charged with the task of removing asbestos were ordered to leave the site when it was determined that their well being may have been at risk due to exposure to asbestos materials. Though the violations are still under investigation, it appears that perhaps the original contractor was not licensed to perform asbestos removal , which prompted the site developer – M&M Realty Partners – to write a letter to the state in regards to the violations. Since that time, a licensed asbestos contractor has resumed asbestos removal at the location after Adel Merdan requested a waiver of the 10-day notification process that would have stalled the work further. “As you are aware, our prior demolition contractor, Metro Industrial Wrecking and Environmental Contracts and their asbestos abatement subcontractors, Dennison and ATC, started asbestos abatement on the above-referenced project,” Merdan explained. “However, due to the fines levied by the NJ Department of Labor for violations during asbestos abatement, those contractors had to be removed from the project.” So far, the developer and the contractors have refused to comment on the situation, neither admitting nor denying violations of state asbestos laws, which demand that only licensed, trained asbestos abatement professionals can remove the carcinogenic material. That’s because old, damaged asbestos must be removed in a certain way so as not to release dangerous, sharp fibers into the air, where they can be inhaled and later cause diseases such as mesothelioma cancer , a rare form of the disease that kills about 3,000 Americans each year.